Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade nuget dependencies for v2.3 release. #2393

Closed
10 tasks done
hikalkan opened this issue Aug 4, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed
10 tasks done

Upgrade nuget dependencies for v2.3 release. #2393

hikalkan opened this issue Aug 4, 2017 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@hikalkan
Copy link
Member

hikalkan commented Aug 4, 2017

  • AutoMapper to 6.1.1.
  • MailKit to 1.16.2.
  • Quartz to 2.6.0.
  • protobuf-net to 2.3.1
  • Hangfire.AspNetCore to 1.6.14.
  • Hangfire.Core to 1.6.14.
  • JetBrains.Annotations to 11.0.0.
  • Newtonsoft.Json to 10.0.3.
  • System.Linq.Dynamic.Core to 1.0.7.6.
  • StackExchange.Redis.StrongName to 1.2.6.
@hikalkan hikalkan added this to the v2.3 milestone Aug 4, 2017
hikalkan added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 4, 2017
@natiki
Copy link
Contributor

natiki commented Aug 4, 2017

Hi @hikalkan

As Quartz 2.6 requires a DB change this would be a breaking change. Any reason for the need to go to Quartz 2.60?

@hikalkan
Copy link
Member Author

hikalkan commented Aug 4, 2017

I haven't known that. Isn't Quartz making automatic migration or is it hard to migrate it?

@natiki
Copy link
Contributor

natiki commented Aug 5, 2017

Its not hard but you have to run a SQL script: https://www.quartz-scheduler.net/2017/07/30/quartznet-2.6-released.html

One of the reasons we held off on it.

@hikalkan
Copy link
Member Author

hikalkan commented Aug 5, 2017

It seems it's easy to run the script.
We want to keep the latest version of all dependencies (unless there is a really significiant reason), otherwise developers have problems when they want to upgrade these packages themselves.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants