-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add modify_range for tweaking fix range selection #843
Conversation
gonna rename it in later commit.
WalkthroughThe recent update refines the codebase by enhancing pattern matching with the introduction of Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #843 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 71.29% 71.31% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 71 71
Lines 4547 4594 +47
==========================================
+ Hits 3242 3276 +34
- Misses 1305 1318 +13 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- crates/config/src/fixer.rs (5 hunks)
- crates/core/src/matcher/node_match.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/core/src/replacer.rs (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
crates/core/src/replacer.rs (2)
1-1: The import of
Matcher
andNodeMatch
is correct and necessary for the new functionality introduced in theReplacer
trait.19-26: The
modify_range
method correctly calculates the new range based on the match length provided by thematcher
. However, ensure that thematcher.get_match_len
method handles cases where the length cannot be determined and that the fallback to the original range is the intended behavior.Verification successful
The
get_match_len
method implementations inmatcher.rs
indicate that error handling is in place by returning anOption<usize>
, which allows for the case where no match length is found by returningNone
. This aligns with the fallback behavior used in themodify_range
method inreplacer.rs
, which uses the original range if no length is determined. Therefore, the review comment's concern seems to be addressed in the code.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the get_match_len method has appropriate error handling and fallback mechanisms. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'impl $_ for $_ { $$$ fn get_match_len($$$) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search to find the get_match_len method in any context. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'fn get_match_len($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for the string "get_match_len" to find any occurrence in the codebase. rg "get_match_len"Length of output: 881
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the implementation of get_match_len in matcher.rs. rg "fn get_match_len" crates/core/src/matcher.rs -A 10Length of output: 1080
crates/core/src/matcher/node_match.rs (1)
- 58-60: The
make_edit
method has been updated to use themodify_range
method from theReplacer
trait. The calculation ofposition
anddeleted_length
appears to be correct, assuming thatmodify_range
returns a valid range. It is important to ensure that themodify_range
method is thoroughly tested to prevent any off-by-one errors or other range-related bugs.crates/config/src/fixer.rs (3)
6-6: The import of
Matcher
andNodeMatch
is correct and aligns with the changes made in thecore
crate to support the new functionality.42-47: The
Expansion
struct has been introduced, replacing the previousExpander
. Ensure that all references toExpander
have been updated toExpansion
throughout the codebase to maintain consistency.Verification successful
The executed script searched for occurrences of the term "Expander" within Rust files and did not produce any output. This suggests that there are no references to "Expander" in the Rust files of the codebase, which would imply that all references have been successfully updated to "Expansion".
Based on this information, it appears that the review comment has been addressed correctly, and there are no remaining references to the old
Expander
struct.* 150-165: The `expand_start` function seems to correctly calculate the start of the range. However, it is important to ensure that the `matches.match_node_with_env` method and the `stop_by.find` method are robust and handle edge cases properly.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that all references to `Expander` have been updated to `Expansion`. rg --type rust "Expander"Length of output: 25
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- crates/config/src/fixer.rs (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- crates/config/src/fixer.rs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- crates/config/src/fixer.rs (5 hunks)
- crates/core/src/matcher/node_match.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/core/src/replacer.rs (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- crates/config/src/fixer.rs
- crates/core/src/matcher/node_match.rs
- crates/core/src/replacer.rs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- crates/config/src/fixer.rs (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- crates/config/src/fixer.rs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- crates/cli/src/print/colored_print.rs (2 hunks)
- crates/cli/src/print/interactive_print.rs (3 hunks)
- crates/cli/src/print/mod.rs (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 8
crates/cli/src/print/mod.rs (2)
65-65: The addition of the
range
field in theDiff
struct is consistent with the PR objectives and AI-generated summaries. It's initialized correctly in thegenerate
method.80-80: The
range
field is correctly initialized using theedit
object'sposition
anddeleted_length
. This should accurately represent the range of text that the diff is modifying.crates/cli/src/print/interactive_print.rs (3)
138-138: The logic to skip diffs if
diff.range.start
is less than theend
variable seems correct. It ensures that overlapping diffs are not processed twice.148-148: The
end
variable is correctly updated todiff.range.end
when a diff is confirmed, which will be used to check for overlapping diffs in subsequent iterations.213-213: The
range
field is used correctly to slice the old content and insert the replacement text in theapply_rewrite
function.crates/cli/src/print/colored_print.rs (3)
187-187: The use of the
range
field to skip overlapping diffs in theprint_rule_diffs
function is correct and prevents the same diff from being applied multiple times.439-439: The
range
field is correctly used to determine the start of the diff in theprint_diffs
function.444-444: The logic to skip overlapping diffs using the
range
field in theprint_diffs
function is correct and ensures that diffs are not applied more than once.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- crates/cli/src/print/colored_print.rs (2 hunks)
- crates/cli/src/print/interactive_print.rs (3 hunks)
- crates/cli/src/print/mod.rs (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- crates/cli/src/print/colored_print.rs
- crates/cli/src/print/interactive_print.rs
Additional comments: 3
crates/cli/src/print/mod.rs (3)
65-65: The addition of the
range
field to theDiff
struct is a logical enhancement for tracking the range of text that a diff applies to. This should facilitate more precise updates and is likely to be used in conjunction with the newmodify_range
feature mentioned in the PR objectives.80-80: The calculation of the
range
within thegenerate
method seems correct, assuming thatedit.position
marks the start of the range andedit.deleted_length
is the length of the text being replaced. It's important to ensure thatedit.position
andedit.deleted_length
are accurately representing the intended values for this calculation to be correct.Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that
edit.position
andedit.deleted_length
are used consistently across the codebase, including within theprint/mod.rs
file, to calculate a range. This suggests that the review comment is correct in stating that the calculation of therange
within thegenerate
method seems correct, assuming thatedit.position
marks the start of the range andedit.deleted_length
is the length of the text being replaced.* 84-89: The `get_root_text` method is a useful addition to the `Diff` struct, providing access to the root document's source code. This is particularly important given that the root node's text may not start at the beginning of the document, as noted in the comments. This method will likely be used to retrieve the full context of the code where the diff is applied.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that edit.position and edit.deleted_length are correctly calculated and used. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'let edit = $_.make_edit($$$); $_.position..$_.position + $_.deleted_length'Length of output: 606
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Simplify the ast-grep pattern to verify the usage of edit.position and edit.deleted_length ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'let edit = $_.make_edit($$$);'Length of output: 319
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Additionally, check for the definition and usage of edit.position and edit.deleted_length separately ast-grep --lang rust --pattern '$_.position' ast-grep --lang rust --pattern '$_.deleted_length'Length of output: 1252
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs (5 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs (5)
- 69-70: The addition of the
replacement_offsets
field to theMatchJSON
struct is consistent with the PR's objective to enhance fix range selection. Ensure that the serialization condition (Option::is_none
) is tested to confirm that the field is omitted from serialization when it isNone
.Verification successful
Based on the review of the
json_print.rs
file and the associated tests, while there is no explicit test case for thereplacement_offsets
field beingNone
, the standard behavior ofserde
with theskip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none"
attribute indicates that the field will be omitted from serialization when it isNone
. TheMatchJSON::new
method, which does not set thereplacement_offsets
field, further supports this behavior. Therefore, we can conclude that the serialization condition is functioning as intended.* 161-166: The `diff` method added to the `MatchJSON` struct is a new feature that allows for the creation of a `MatchJSON` instance from a `Diff` object. This method correctly sets the `replacement` and `replacement_offsets` fields. It is important to ensure that this method is covered by unit tests to verify its functionality.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that serialization of MatchJSON omits the replacement_offsets field when it is None # This can be done by creating a MatchJSON object with replacement_offsets set to None and serializing it to JSON. # The resulting JSON should not contain the replacement_offsets field.Length of output: 0
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Since we cannot directly instantiate and serialize a Rust struct in a shell script, we will look for a test case # in the codebase that might already be testing the serialization of the MatchJSON struct. # We will use rg to search for any test cases that involve MatchJSON serialization. rg "MatchJSON.*serialize" --type rustLength of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Broaden the search to find any occurrences of MatchJSON within test files. # This might help us locate a context where serialization is tested or mentioned. rg "MatchJSON" --type rust --files-with-matchesLength of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look inside json_print.rs for any inline tests or examples related to serialization. # We will use cat to display the contents of the file and then manually inspect for relevant sections. cat crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rsLength of output: 17131
208-221: The
diff
method added to theRuleMatchJSON
struct is similar to the one inMatchJSON
but also includes rule-specific information. This method should be tested to ensure that it correctly incorporates the rule information into theRuleMatchJSON
instance.323-323: The refactoring of the
print_diffs
method to use the newdiff
method ofMatchJSON
is a good example of code reuse and simplification. Ensure that the behavior ofprint_diffs
remains consistent after the refactoring.Verification successful
The output from the
cat
command provides the implementation of theMatchJSON::diff
method within thejson_print.rs
file. The method creates a newMatchJSON
instance using thenew
method and then sets thereplacement
andreplacement_offsets
fields with the values from theDiff
instance.The
git log -p
output shows the previous implementation of theprint_diffs
method. It indicates that the method used to create aMatchJSON
object, set thereplacement
field manually, and then pass it toprint_docs
. The new implementation streamlines this by using theMatchJSON::diff
method to perform these actions, which should maintain the same behavior as long as thediff
method sets thereplacement
field correctly.Based on the provided outputs, it appears that the refactoring maintains the same behavior as the previous implementation by encapsulating the logic of setting the
replacement
field into theMatchJSON::diff
method. The tests in thejson_print.rs
file also suggest that the behavior of printing diffs has been preserved, as the tests check for the presence of thereplacement
field in the JSON output.Given this information, it seems that the behavior of the
print_diffs
method remains consistent after the refactoring, as the newMatchJSON::diff
method performs the same actions that were previously done withinprint_diffs
itself.* 332-334: The refactoring of the `print_rule_diffs` method to use the new `diff` method of `RuleMatchJSON` is also a good example of code reuse. Similar to `print_diffs`, it is important to verify that the behavior of `print_rule_diffs` remains consistent after the refactoring.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the behavior of print_diffs remains consistent after refactoring # This can be done by comparing the output of the method before and after the refactoring with the same input data. # The output JSON should be identical in both cases.Length of output: 0
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, let's find the implementation of the `diff` method in `MatchJSON` to understand its behavior. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'impl MatchJSON { $$$ pub fn diff($_, $_) -> Self { $$$ } $$$ }' # Next, let's search for any tests related to the `print_diffs` method to see if they have been updated. rg "fn print_diffs" --files-with-matchesLength of output: 331
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Since the ast-grep did not return the implementation details, let's try to find the file containing the `MatchJSON` struct and its methods. rg "struct MatchJSON" --files-with-matches # Now, let's inspect the content of the files that contain the `print_diffs` method to find any tests or previous implementations. rg "fn print_diffs" -A 10 -B 10 --files-with-matchesLength of output: 313
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's view the implementation of the `diff` method in `MatchJSON` within `json_print.rs`. rg "impl MatchJSON" -A 30 -B 2 crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs # Now, let's view the content around the `print_diffs` method in the listed files to find any tests or the previous implementation. rg "fn print_diffs" -A 10 -B 10 crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rsLength of output: 821
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Attempt to directly view the contents of `json_print.rs` to find the `diff` method implementation. cat crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs # Additionally, let's try to find any git history that might show the previous implementation of `print_diffs`. git log -p crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs | rg "fn print_diffs" -A 10 -B 10 -C 5Length of output: 18027
gonna rename it in later commit.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Refactor