Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add modify_range for tweaking fix range selection #843

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

HerringtonDarkholme
Copy link
Member

@HerringtonDarkholme HerringtonDarkholme commented Jan 9, 2024

gonna rename it in later commit.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced matching capabilities with new types for improved code analysis.
    • Introduced range modification methods to better handle code transformations.
  • Improvements

    • Streamlined text replacement and range calculations within the codebase.
    • Refined the printing functions for clearer display of code differences.
  • Refactor

    • Renamed and restructured key components for greater clarity and consistency.
    • Updated internal logic for calculating positions and lengths in code modifications.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update refines the codebase by enhancing pattern matching with the introduction of Matcher and NodeMatch types, improving the range modification logic in the Fixer struct, and streamlining the replacement text generation. Changes in the CLI module reflect a shift towards more encapsulated methods for accessing match ranges and root text, indicating a move towards a more abstracted and possibly more maintainable code structure.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../config/src/fixer.rs Introduced Matcher and NodeMatch, renamed Expander to Expansion, and added modify_range method in Fixer.
.../core/src/matcher/node_match.rs Updated NodeMatch to use new methods for range calculation and text replacement.
.../core/src/replacer.rs Added get_replaced_range and modify_range methods to Replacer.
.../cli/src/print/... Replaced direct range and text access with new methods across colored_print.rs and interactive_print.rs. Updated Diff struct with new range field and get_root_text method.

Poem

🐇 "In the realm of code, where matchers play,
A rabbit hopped through, refining the fray.
With each little tweak, the structure more clear,
Celebrate the craft, for progress is here!" 🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 20 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (f87fab4) 71.29% compared to head (f3e6071) 71.31%.

Files Patch % Lines
crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs 37.50% 10 Missing ⚠️
crates/config/src/fixer.rs 77.14% 8 Missing ⚠️
crates/cli/src/print/interactive_print.rs 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #843      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.29%   71.31%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          71       71              
  Lines        4547     4594      +47     
==========================================
+ Hits         3242     3276      +34     
- Misses       1305     1318      +13     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f87fab4 and 371d273.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • crates/config/src/fixer.rs (5 hunks)
  • crates/core/src/matcher/node_match.rs (1 hunks)
  • crates/core/src/replacer.rs (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
crates/core/src/replacer.rs (2)
  • 1-1: The import of Matcher and NodeMatch is correct and necessary for the new functionality introduced in the Replacer trait.

  • 19-26: The modify_range method correctly calculates the new range based on the match length provided by the matcher. However, ensure that the matcher.get_match_len method handles cases where the length cannot be determined and that the fallback to the original range is the intended behavior.

Verification successful

The get_match_len method implementations in matcher.rs indicate that error handling is in place by returning an Option<usize>, which allows for the case where no match length is found by returning None. This aligns with the fallback behavior used in the modify_range method in replacer.rs, which uses the original range if no length is determined. Therefore, the review comment's concern seems to be addressed in the code.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the get_match_len method has appropriate error handling and fallback mechanisms.
ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'impl $_ for $_ {
  $$$
  fn get_match_len($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 103



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find the get_match_len method in any context.
ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'fn get_match_len($$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 66



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Use ripgrep to search for the string "get_match_len" to find any occurrence in the codebase.
rg "get_match_len"

Length of output: 881



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Examine the implementation of get_match_len in matcher.rs.
rg "fn get_match_len" crates/core/src/matcher.rs -A 10

Length of output: 1080

crates/core/src/matcher/node_match.rs (1)
  • 58-60: The make_edit method has been updated to use the modify_range method from the Replacer trait. The calculation of position and deleted_length appears to be correct, assuming that modify_range returns a valid range. It is important to ensure that the modify_range method is thoroughly tested to prevent any off-by-one errors or other range-related bugs.
crates/config/src/fixer.rs (3)
  • 6-6: The import of Matcher and NodeMatch is correct and aligns with the changes made in the core crate to support the new functionality.

  • 42-47: The Expansion struct has been introduced, replacing the previous Expander. Ensure that all references to Expander have been updated to Expansion throughout the codebase to maintain consistency.

Verification successful

The executed script searched for occurrences of the term "Expander" within Rust files and did not produce any output. This suggests that there are no references to "Expander" in the Rust files of the codebase, which would imply that all references have been successfully updated to "Expansion".

Based on this information, it appears that the review comment has been addressed correctly, and there are no remaining references to the old Expander struct.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that all references to `Expander` have been updated to `Expansion`.
rg --type rust "Expander"

Length of output: 25

* 150-165: The `expand_start` function seems to correctly calculate the start of the range. However, it is important to ensure that the `matches.match_node_with_env` method and the `stop_by.find` method are robust and handle edge cases properly.

crates/config/src/fixer.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/config/src/fixer.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 371d273 and 511bc5b.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • crates/config/src/fixer.rs (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • crates/config/src/fixer.rs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 511bc5b and 6e4f2de.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • crates/config/src/fixer.rs (5 hunks)
  • crates/core/src/matcher/node_match.rs (1 hunks)
  • crates/core/src/replacer.rs (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • crates/config/src/fixer.rs
  • crates/core/src/matcher/node_match.rs
  • crates/core/src/replacer.rs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e4f2de and 2a8d22a.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • crates/config/src/fixer.rs (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • crates/config/src/fixer.rs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2a8d22a and 2764394.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • crates/cli/src/print/colored_print.rs (2 hunks)
  • crates/cli/src/print/interactive_print.rs (3 hunks)
  • crates/cli/src/print/mod.rs (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 8
crates/cli/src/print/mod.rs (2)
  • 65-65: The addition of the range field in the Diff struct is consistent with the PR objectives and AI-generated summaries. It's initialized correctly in the generate method.

  • 80-80: The range field is correctly initialized using the edit object's position and deleted_length. This should accurately represent the range of text that the diff is modifying.

crates/cli/src/print/interactive_print.rs (3)
  • 138-138: The logic to skip diffs if diff.range.start is less than the end variable seems correct. It ensures that overlapping diffs are not processed twice.

  • 148-148: The end variable is correctly updated to diff.range.end when a diff is confirmed, which will be used to check for overlapping diffs in subsequent iterations.

  • 213-213: The range field is used correctly to slice the old content and insert the replacement text in the apply_rewrite function.

crates/cli/src/print/colored_print.rs (3)
  • 187-187: The use of the range field to skip overlapping diffs in the print_rule_diffs function is correct and prevents the same diff from being applied multiple times.

  • 439-439: The range field is correctly used to determine the start of the diff in the print_diffs function.

  • 444-444: The logic to skip overlapping diffs using the range field in the print_diffs function is correct and ensures that diffs are not applied more than once.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2764394 and 2236749.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • crates/cli/src/print/colored_print.rs (2 hunks)
  • crates/cli/src/print/interactive_print.rs (3 hunks)
  • crates/cli/src/print/mod.rs (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • crates/cli/src/print/colored_print.rs
  • crates/cli/src/print/interactive_print.rs
Additional comments: 3
crates/cli/src/print/mod.rs (3)
  • 65-65: The addition of the range field to the Diff struct is a logical enhancement for tracking the range of text that a diff applies to. This should facilitate more precise updates and is likely to be used in conjunction with the new modify_range feature mentioned in the PR objectives.

  • 80-80: The calculation of the range within the generate method seems correct, assuming that edit.position marks the start of the range and edit.deleted_length is the length of the text being replaced. It's important to ensure that edit.position and edit.deleted_length are accurately representing the intended values for this calculation to be correct.

Verification successful

The verification process has confirmed that edit.position and edit.deleted_length are used consistently across the codebase, including within the print/mod.rs file, to calculate a range. This suggests that the review comment is correct in stating that the calculation of the range within the generate method seems correct, assuming that edit.position marks the start of the range and edit.deleted_length is the length of the text being replaced.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that edit.position and edit.deleted_length are correctly calculated and used.
ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'let edit = $_.make_edit($$$); $_.position..$_.position + $_.deleted_length'

Length of output: 606



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Simplify the ast-grep pattern to verify the usage of edit.position and edit.deleted_length
ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'let edit = $_.make_edit($$$);'

Length of output: 319


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Additionally, check for the definition and usage of edit.position and edit.deleted_length separately
ast-grep --lang rust --pattern '$_.position'
ast-grep --lang rust --pattern '$_.deleted_length'

Length of output: 1252

* 84-89: The `get_root_text` method is a useful addition to the `Diff` struct, providing access to the root document's source code. This is particularly important given that the root node's text may not start at the beginning of the document, as noted in the comments. This method will likely be used to retrieve the full context of the code where the diff is applied.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2236749 and f3e6071.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs (5 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs (5)
  • 69-70: The addition of the replacement_offsets field to the MatchJSON struct is consistent with the PR's objective to enhance fix range selection. Ensure that the serialization condition (Option::is_none) is tested to confirm that the field is omitted from serialization when it is None.
Verification successful

Based on the review of the json_print.rs file and the associated tests, while there is no explicit test case for the replacement_offsets field being None, the standard behavior of serde with the skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none" attribute indicates that the field will be omitted from serialization when it is None. The MatchJSON::new method, which does not set the replacement_offsets field, further supports this behavior. Therefore, we can conclude that the serialization condition is functioning as intended.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that serialization of MatchJSON omits the replacement_offsets field when it is None
# This can be done by creating a MatchJSON object with replacement_offsets set to None and serializing it to JSON.
# The resulting JSON should not contain the replacement_offsets field.

Length of output: 0



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Since we cannot directly instantiate and serialize a Rust struct in a shell script, we will look for a test case
# in the codebase that might already be testing the serialization of the MatchJSON struct.
# We will use rg to search for any test cases that involve MatchJSON serialization.

rg "MatchJSON.*serialize" --type rust

Length of output: 39



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any occurrences of MatchJSON within test files.
# This might help us locate a context where serialization is tested or mentioned.

rg "MatchJSON" --type rust --files-with-matches

Length of output: 82



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look inside json_print.rs for any inline tests or examples related to serialization.
# We will use cat to display the contents of the file and then manually inspect for relevant sections.

cat crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs

Length of output: 17131

* 161-166: The `diff` method added to the `MatchJSON` struct is a new feature that allows for the creation of a `MatchJSON` instance from a `Diff` object. This method correctly sets the `replacement` and `replacement_offsets` fields. It is important to ensure that this method is covered by unit tests to verify its functionality.
  • 208-221: The diff method added to the RuleMatchJSON struct is similar to the one in MatchJSON but also includes rule-specific information. This method should be tested to ensure that it correctly incorporates the rule information into the RuleMatchJSON instance.

  • 323-323: The refactoring of the print_diffs method to use the new diff method of MatchJSON is a good example of code reuse and simplification. Ensure that the behavior of print_diffs remains consistent after the refactoring.

Verification successful

The output from the cat command provides the implementation of the MatchJSON::diff method within the json_print.rs file. The method creates a new MatchJSON instance using the new method and then sets the replacement and replacement_offsets fields with the values from the Diff instance.

The git log -p output shows the previous implementation of the print_diffs method. It indicates that the method used to create a MatchJSON object, set the replacement field manually, and then pass it to print_docs. The new implementation streamlines this by using the MatchJSON::diff method to perform these actions, which should maintain the same behavior as long as the diff method sets the replacement field correctly.

Based on the provided outputs, it appears that the refactoring maintains the same behavior as the previous implementation by encapsulating the logic of setting the replacement field into the MatchJSON::diff method. The tests in the json_print.rs file also suggest that the behavior of printing diffs has been preserved, as the tests check for the presence of the replacement field in the JSON output.

Given this information, it seems that the behavior of the print_diffs method remains consistent after the refactoring, as the new MatchJSON::diff method performs the same actions that were previously done within print_diffs itself.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the behavior of print_diffs remains consistent after refactoring
# This can be done by comparing the output of the method before and after the refactoring with the same input data.
# The output JSON should be identical in both cases.

Length of output: 0



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the implementation of the `diff` method in `MatchJSON` to understand its behavior.
ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'impl MatchJSON {
  $$$
  pub fn diff($_, $_) -> Self {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Next, let's search for any tests related to the `print_diffs` method to see if they have been updated.
rg "fn print_diffs" --files-with-matches

Length of output: 331



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Since the ast-grep did not return the implementation details, let's try to find the file containing the `MatchJSON` struct and its methods.
rg "struct MatchJSON" --files-with-matches

# Now, let's inspect the content of the files that contain the `print_diffs` method to find any tests or previous implementations.
rg "fn print_diffs" -A 10 -B 10 --files-with-matches

Length of output: 313



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's view the implementation of the `diff` method in `MatchJSON` within `json_print.rs`.
rg "impl MatchJSON" -A 30 -B 2 crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs

# Now, let's view the content around the `print_diffs` method in the listed files to find any tests or the previous implementation.
rg "fn print_diffs" -A 10 -B 10 crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs

Length of output: 821



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Attempt to directly view the contents of `json_print.rs` to find the `diff` method implementation.
cat crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs

# Additionally, let's try to find any git history that might show the previous implementation of `print_diffs`.
git log -p crates/cli/src/print/json_print.rs | rg "fn print_diffs" -A 10 -B 10 -C 5

Length of output: 18027

* 332-334: The refactoring of the `print_rule_diffs` method to use the new `diff` method of `RuleMatchJSON` is also a good example of code reuse. Similar to `print_diffs`, it is important to verify that the behavior of `print_rule_diffs` remains consistent after the refactoring.

@HerringtonDarkholme HerringtonDarkholme added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit d7b6b42 Jan 10, 2024
4 checks passed
@HerringtonDarkholme HerringtonDarkholme deleted the powerful-fixer branch January 10, 2024 09:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant