-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unpin pandas upperbound dependency #620
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #620 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.30% 93.30%
=======================================
Files 41 41
Lines 1672 1672
Branches 211 211
=======================================
Hits 1560 1560
Misses 89 89
Partials 23 23
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ requires-python = ">=3.7" | |||
dependencies = [ | |||
"apache-airflow>=2.0", | |||
"markupsafe>=1.1.1,<2.1.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Worth investigating in a separate PR/issue if we can remove markupsafe
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kaxil I'll create a ticket for the same. Should it be part of this sprint?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes please
Description
What is the current behavior?
We have pinned Pandas library
astro-sdk/pyproject.toml
Line 19 in 6b90c92
"pandas>=1.3.4,<=1.3.5",
This was done in #130 but a lot of things have changed since. Let's investigate if this pin (upper bound) is still required.
Related Slack thread: https://astronomer.slack.com/archives/C03868KGF2Q/p1659546153698379?thread_ts=1659545419.511649&cid=C03868KGF2Q
closes: #604
What is the new behavior?
unpinned the upper bound of pandas dependency
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Nope