Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude files containing dead links #587

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 16, 2022
Merged

Exclude files containing dead links #587

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 16, 2022

Conversation

feluelle
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 16, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #587 (9c5d63d) into main (2f6fe2e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #587   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.23%   98.23%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        3957     3957           
=======================================
  Hits         3887     3887           
  Misses         70       70           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@rajaths010494 rajaths010494 merged commit 3e8f058 into main Aug 16, 2022
@rajaths010494 rajaths010494 deleted the feluelle-patch-1 branch August 16, 2022 11:59
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ repos:
rev: v3.10.2
hooks:
- id: markdown-link-check
# Ignoring files containing dead links which are actually not dead.
exclude: dev/README.md|CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe we should not exclude these files here as that would beat the purpose of the markdown-link-check pre-commit check then. Can we check if something else is wrong if the links are not actually dead or if there is some issue with the pre-commit hook itself?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. This was only being done to unblock other PRs. We should find a way to fix the markdown issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants