Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sdss fixes python3 #91

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

jwoillez
Copy link
Member

@mirochaj, I don't think I have changed any of the interfaces, but you might want to check.
I may still be able to clean the io.StringIO part a little more. Will let you know when ready to merge.

Parse directly the returned text, rather than encapsulating it in a
file object with io.StringIO.
@jwoillez
Copy link
Member Author

Done for now. Ready for review...

@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor

@jwoillez - I think this is fine, but I'm going to merge #86 first, so this may need a rebase after.

@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor

@jwoillez - actually, I'm going to merge this directly onto #86 and continue working on that branch. Thanks so much for figuring this out!

@jwoillez
Copy link
Member Author

The three commits above are now part of pull request #84. Closing...

@jwoillez jwoillez closed this May 29, 2013
@jwoillez
Copy link
Member Author

@keflavich - Would you take more commits on SDSS, or should I wait for the python3 merges you are working on?
For what I have in mind see: cc238ac

@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor

I merged #84 so that you can continue development on that. Go ahead and submit more PRs. This is a high-activity clean-up phase, so I'm OK with merging in a lot of changes rather rapidly. Also, that commit looks awesomely simplifying.

@jwoillez
Copy link
Member Author

Sweet! On my way.

@jwoillez jwoillez deleted the sdss_fix_python3 branch November 9, 2013 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants