Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to regenerate functions #387

Closed
boyney123 opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 10 comments
Closed

Ability to regenerate functions #387

boyney123 opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 10 comments
Labels

Comments

@boyney123
Copy link
Contributor

Reason/Context

When you run npx create-glee-app it will scaffold your application which is great. But as time goes on and my async API file changes, new functions may be added or ones removed, etc.

I think it would be useful to have a command that could just regenerate the functions?

It could give users the ability to just re-generate functions rather than having to add them and edit them themselfs.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@fmvilas fmvilas transferred this issue from asyncapi/glee Oct 29, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@fmvilas
Copy link
Member

fmvilas commented Oct 29, 2021

@boyney123 moved this issue to create-glee-app repo instead.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Feb 27, 2022
@fmvilas
Copy link
Member

fmvilas commented Feb 28, 2022

Still relevant. We'll probably have to move it to the AsyncAPI cli.

@fmvilas fmvilas removed the stale label Feb 28, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jun 29, 2022
@fmvilas fmvilas removed the stale label Jul 5, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Nov 3, 2022
@fmvilas fmvilas transferred this issue from asyncapi-archived-repos/create-glee-app Nov 11, 2022
@fmvilas
Copy link
Member

fmvilas commented Nov 11, 2022

Transferred this issue to CLI so we start the effort here instead of in the create-glee-app tool.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Nov 12, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Mar 13, 2023
@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Apr 3, 2023

closing the issues, as it is just a food for stale bot. If there is a need for such functionality and someone is ready to contribute please open new issue or just leave a comment and we reopen

@derberg derberg closed this as completed Apr 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants