Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Building a long term vision around converter #221

Open
jonaslagoni opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Building a long term vision around converter #221

jonaslagoni opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Sponsor Member

jonaslagoni commented Jan 25, 2024

Reason/Context

The sole purpose of the current converter is converting AsyncAPI versions from one version to the next.

However, it does not really create a strong community around it nor enable further development of the tool because it is so narrowly focused on one specific area.

So I want to propose that we open up the tool to encompass convert to AsyncAPI meaning that we can have an implementation that converts from OpenAPI, Protobuf, CloudEvents, Postman collections, etc, into AsyncAPI documents. This way we open up a bunch of integration options for people who already use existing standards to switch over or try AsyncAPI.

Each of these implementations can have its own subset of code owners, in a similar fashion as we have achieved with Modelina: https://github.com/asyncapi/modelina/blob/master/CODEOWNERS

How does that idea sound @derberg (even though you leaving 😆), @fmvilas, @magicmatatjahu?

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 25, 2024
@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni changed the title Building a stronger community around converter Building a long term vision around converter Jan 25, 2024
@fmvilas
Copy link
Member

fmvilas commented Feb 1, 2024

I like the idea. It may be a good way to push the interest of this package. Plus, converting from OpenAPI, Postman collections, etc. should help increase adoption too.

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Mar 18, 2024

definitely makes sense to extend the scope of the library

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants