Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AsyncAPI spec v3 support in markdown template #341

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
Tracked by #294 ...
jonaslagoni opened this issue Jun 5, 2023 · 3 comments 路 Fixed by #360
Closed
1 of 2 tasks
Tracked by #294 ...

AsyncAPI spec v3 support in markdown template #341

jonaslagoni opened this issue Jun 5, 2023 · 3 comments 路 Fixed by #360
Labels
enhancement New feature or request released

Comments

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Sponsor Member

jonaslagoni commented Jun 5, 2023

Reason/Context

This Issue is used to track changes needed to support AsyncAPI v3. As a code owner, please edit this list of TODO tasks in order to properly track the progress 馃檪 Once this issue is closed it means that v3 is now fully supported in this library.

Scope

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 5, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 5, 2023

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@fmvilas
Copy link
Member

fmvilas commented Sep 14, 2023

/progress 90 Just waiting for #360 to be merged.

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

馃帀 This issue has been resolved in version 1.4.0 馃帀

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 馃摝馃殌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request released
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants