-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Silent atpass #421
Silent atpass #421
Conversation
@swhite: there is no need for that: just set |
Are you sure about this? In fact I crashed the cluster doing something similar...am I missing something? |
Ah no I take it back, |
Why? The problem with Matlab is that you cannot modify in-place the input argument. There in no problem in python, so all the tracking is done in-place, without needing to allocate anything. |
Ok fair enough, I'll roll back and update the documentation in this PR to make this clear |
Ok, this is now just a documentation update, anything to add while we are at it? |
|
||
.. note:: | ||
|
||
* For multiparticle tracking with large number of turn the size of ``r_out`` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"number of turns", may be ?
Ok for me ! |
Do I have to build the sphinx documentation or is it done automatically on merge? (sorry I haven't followed very closely your latest developments) |
Nothing to do: the doc will be updated on merge. Magic ! |
By default atpass returns a large array storing all particles at each turn and refpts.
To avoid memory issues it is possible to call atpass with
refpts=[]
, this feature is added to the documentation in this PR