does it makes sense to have a translateKleisli

[dvic]

Hi!

Does it makes sense to have something like this in the library (transforming a Kleisli into the target effect if it's part of the stack):

  def translateKleisli[T[_], R, U, S, A](e: Eff[R, A], s: S)(
      implicit mx: Member.Aux[Kleisli[T, S, ?], R, U],
      m: T |= U): Eff[U, A] =
    interpret.translate(e) {
      new Translate[Kleisli[T, S, ?], U] {
        override def apply[X](kv: Kleisli[T, S, X]): Eff[U, X] = {
          send[T, U, X](kv.run(s))
        }
      }
    }

I only saw support for Reader (which is Kleisli with Id as an effect) in the library and I wondered if there was a particular reason for this (I thought I'd ask before preparing a PR).

Thanks for the effort by the way, really like this library!

[edmundnoble]

This is interesting. It's like a combination of runReader and ReaderT. I can see this being useful.

[etorreborre]

I haven't had a use-case for Kleisli as an effect but I can see where that would be useful. Yes please go ahead with a PR.

[dvic]

Cool! I'm going to make a PR for this. Shall I place it in ReaderInterpretation along with the Reader interpretors?

[edmundnoble]

That sounds apt to me.