Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.

Why not package.cson? #464

Closed
danielbayley opened this issue Oct 29, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Why not package.cson? #464

danielbayley opened this issue Oct 29, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@danielbayley
Copy link

apm publish throws No package.json file found at … when attempting to use a package.cson instead… Just wondering if this is intentional; and if so, how come?

I found the same question here https://discuss.atom.io/t/why-isnt-package-cson-supported-actually-it-is/16849

@thedaniel
Copy link
Contributor

It's not intentional in the sense of "we considered it and decided not to", it just never really came up in an issue before now.. I think that with apm being a wrapper around npm which has stated it will not support cson we will likely not be supporting package.cson files in the package publishing API either.

@danielbayley
Copy link
Author

I get that npm refuse to support it. But as you say, with apm being a wrapper around it (and clearly most of the Atom ecosystem already accesses the CSON parser) I don't see why compiling it to package.json as an intermediate step would be so bad? More on this is popping up here https://discuss.atom.io/t/how-can-we-help-you-write-packages/4268/69

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants