Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ADD] Enable long running regression #251

Merged

Conversation

franchuterivera
Copy link
Contributor

The idea is to trigger a regression every Tuesday that will take the greedy and default portfolio and make sure we achieve a deterministic performance.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 10, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #251 (b97a48e) into development (1818445) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 80.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development     #251      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        80.82%   80.91%   +0.08%     
===============================================
  Files              148      148              
  Lines             8563     8570       +7     
  Branches          1323     1325       +2     
===============================================
+ Hits              6921     6934      +13     
+ Misses            1163     1160       -3     
+ Partials           479      476       -3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...h/pipeline/components/training/trainer/__init__.py 70.32% <0.00%> (ø)
autoPyTorch/api/base_task.py 80.59% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
...peline/components/training/trainer/base_trainer.py 92.73% <100.00%> (+0.25%) ⬆️
autoPyTorch/ensemble/ensemble_builder.py 72.70% <0.00%> (+0.83%) ⬆️
...ipeline/components/setup/network_backbone/utils.py 88.72% <0.00%> (+1.50%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1818445...b97a48e. Read the comment docs.

@franchuterivera franchuterivera marked this pull request as ready for review June 14, 2021 13:18
Copy link
Contributor

@ravinkohli ravinkohli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey, thanks for this PR. It enables us to ensure a minimum performance for our portfolio and the API in general. I think this can be merged

@ravinkohli ravinkohli merged commit eda89f4 into automl:development Jun 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants