You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In PR #577 wide area resolution were disabled. While I admit current state is far from well tested, this feature seems interesting for me. Basic functionality can be tested on dns-sd.org and zeroconf.org domains.
But I agree combinations between mDNS and (wide-area) DNS need better analysis and maybe at least some design. This is area, where I can offer help. Unicast DNS belongs to my area of expertise.
But it would need multiple limitations fixed. Nothing just one PR with few modifications can fix enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Agreed. It would be great to support the unicast DNS properly.
There are already issues where some things are tracked: #239 , #254 but given that that part effectively hasn't been updated since 2007 (apart from a commit fixing a huge memory leak) it's safe to say that it's far from what DNS looks like today unfortunately.
In PR #577 wide area resolution were disabled. While I admit current state is far from well tested, this feature seems interesting for me. Basic functionality can be tested on dns-sd.org and zeroconf.org domains.
But I agree combinations between mDNS and (wide-area) DNS need better analysis and maybe at least some design. This is area, where I can offer help. Unicast DNS belongs to my area of expertise.
But it would need multiple limitations fixed. Nothing just one PR with few modifications can fix enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: