Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow user to use symbols other than TODO? #26

Closed
JeffreyBenjaminBrown opened this issue Oct 28, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Allow user to use symbols other than TODO? #26

JeffreyBenjaminBrown opened this issue Oct 28, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@JeffreyBenjaminBrown
Copy link

I believe the TODO idiom came from the fact that programmers wanted tasks to jump out at them. Toodles allows me to find all those tasks more easily, which means I can preserve that precious capital-letter bandwidth for something else. In my case it's the label "PITFALL", which I still need to jump out at me from within the code, because otherwise I usually won't read those comments, which can lead me to make mistakes.

So I wish I could indicate, somewhere in the yaml file, that "todo" is also something worth reporting.

(In fact, sometimes PITFALL is worth reporting too; I suppose it would be nice to be able to choose from the webpage which labels to draw on. But this is a minor point relative to the first.)

@aviaviavi
Copy link
Owner

Great idea! I have a few bugs and other feature requests in my queue for toodles, but will make it to this when time allows.

If anyone reading wants to take this one on before I get to it, feel free to comment and ask questions here

@damiencourousse
Copy link
Contributor

damiencourousse commented Oct 29, 2018

working on it. Related issue is #8

@aviaviavi
Copy link
Owner

Ha oops forgot there already was an issue for this, gonna close as a duplicate of #8. Thanks Damien and @JeffreyBenjaminBrown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants