You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
GPL implies I have to distribute the sources of the whole project. But I can I still use an MIT license in my project if I use this crate? I've found this stackexchange question, and the accepted answers suggests that I have to use GPL:
> Because GeSHi is GPL, does my framework have to be GPL?
ANSWER: If you distribute your framework, then YES.
That seems a little bit weird to me though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I believe Apache2 is MIT-compatible, and this crate is dual-licensed under Apache2/GPL. The reason I had it initially GPL-licensed is because I translated the x11 clipboard code from xclip's C implementation, which is GPL.
I plan on eventually rewriting that section to be based on xterm's implementation (MIT-licensed) and the ICCCM documentation, and relicensing this to pure Apache2. I haven't yet had time to do this due to other obligations.
Hi,
GPL implies I have to distribute the sources of the whole project. But I can I still use an MIT license in my project if I use this crate? I've found this stackexchange question, and the accepted answers suggests that I have to use GPL:
That seems a little bit weird to me though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: