Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Added RuckZuck to Client Management section #377

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Added RuckZuck to Client Management section #377

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

danfossi
Copy link

@danfossi danfossi commented Feb 19, 2022 •
edited

Select a software from the repository and RuckZuck handles the download and installation for you. RuckZuck can detect and update existing software that was not installed with RuckZuck.

@nodiscc
Copy link
Collaborator

nodiscc commented Sep 6, 2022

@danfossi
Copy link
Author

danfossi commented Sep 6, 2022 •
edited

Chocolatey does not allow the installation of applications in the standard system path (%PROGRAMFILES%), except for the paid version, but installs the applications within the user profile.

About the management of the repository, if desired, it is also possible to set up your own repository (more info here)

nodiscc
nodiscc previously approved these changes Sep 7, 2022
View reviewed changes
@Technetium1
Copy link

@danfossi this is wrong. You simply need admin permissions to do so.

@Technetium1
Copy link

@nodiscc 3361 packages on Chocolatey, but only 615 on RuckZuck. Not sure that this is awesome enough.

@nodiscc nodiscc self-requested a review September 7, 2022 18:57
@nodiscc
Copy link
Collaborator

nodiscc commented Oct 14, 2022

A discussion was started in #357 to determine what should/should not be added to the list ("quality" guidelines).

Your feedback is welcome.

@nodiscc nodiscc removed their request for review October 14, 2022 15:56
@nodiscc nodiscc dismissed their stale review October 14, 2022 15:57

old review

nodiscc added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2023
@nodiscc
pull request template: additional questions to help evaluate actual a…
9cfe6ee 
…wesomeness of projects

- ref. #357
- ref. #449
- ref. #453
- ref. #457
- ref. awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted#3217
- ref. #429
- ref. #377
@nodiscc nodiscc mentioned this pull request Feb 23, 2023
Merged
nodiscc added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
@nodiscc
pull request template: additional questions to help evaluate actual a…
89c2b90 
…wesomeness of projects (#459)

* pull request template: additional questions to help evaluate actual awesomeness of projects

- ref. #357
- ref. #449
- ref. #453
- ref. #457
- ref. awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted#3217
- ref. #429
- ref. #377
nodiscc
nodiscc requested changes Mar 1, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodiscc nodiscc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @danfossi, since #459 we have new contribution guidelines in place, could you please take some time to answer the following questions as best you can? Thanks

  • Why is it awesome?
  • Have you used it? For how long?
  • Is this in a personal or professional setup?
  • How many devices/users/services/... do you manage with it?
  • Biggest pros/cons compared to other solutions?

@nodiscc
Copy link
Collaborator

nodiscc commented Apr 6, 2023

+1 month without reply, closing.

@nodiscc nodiscc closed this Apr 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@nodiscc nodiscc nodiscc requested changes

@Ki-er Ki-er Ki-er approved these changes

Assignees

@danfossi danfossi

Labels
addition not awesome enough reviewers wanted
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@danfossi @nodiscc @Technetium1 @Ki-er