Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "feat: version blocking for CLI" #8747

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 9, 2021

Conversation

sachscode
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #8737
Reverting because of integ test failure.

@sachscode sachscode requested a review from a team as a code owner November 9, 2021 04:15
@sachscode sachscode merged commit 2d5110c into master Nov 9, 2021
ammarkarachi pushed a commit to ammarkarachi/amplify-cli that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2021
sachscode pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2021
* Revert "fix(amplify-category-auth): added username attributes to configure sms (#8624)"

This reverts commit adb70b1.

* Revert "Model vnext unit test update (#8749)"

This reverts commit 8a308a8.

* Revert "Revert "feat: version blocking for CLI (#8737)" (#8747)"

This reverts commit 2d5110c.

* Revert "chore: update aws-sdk, cdk, typescript dependency, regen yarn.lock (#8739)"

This reverts commit d8065a8.

* Revert "feat: version blocking for CLI (#8737)"

This reverts commit b92cd32.

* Revert "Remove pipelineFunction references in favor of resolvers (#8729)"

This reverts commit a0295aa.

* Revert "fix: move @model params to root stack and fix ds logical id (#8736)"

This reverts commit df4408c.

* Revert "fix(amplify-provider-awscloudformation): use amplify prompts for warnings (#8731)"

This reverts commit 98840ec.
SwaySway pushed a commit to SwaySway/amplify-cli that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2021
@evcodes evcodes deleted the revert-8737-versiongating-rere branch February 10, 2023 05:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants