Upgrade aws-sdk beta clients

[Amplifiyer]

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes: Fixes Rekognition, Textract, Kinesis and Storage aws-sdk bugs.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5234 into modularization will not change coverage by %.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           modularization    #5234   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage           72.71%   72.71%           
===============================================
  Files                 195      195           
  Lines               11464    11464           
  Branches             2157     2233   +76     
===============================================
  Hits                 8336     8336           
+ Misses               2978     2959   -19     
- Partials              150      169   +19     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/auth/src/OAuth/OAuth.ts	48.12% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/core/src/Credentials.ts	31.77% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/analytics/src/Analytics.ts	66.86% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/datastore/src/sync/outbox.ts	25.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/datastore/src/storage/storage.ts	67.59% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/core/src/OAuthHelper/GoogleOAuth.ts	32.65% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/xr/src/Providers/SumerianProvider.ts	47.55% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/core/src/OAuthHelper/FacebookOAuth.ts	35.55% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/datastore/src/sync/processors/sync.ts	17.33% <0.00%> (ø)
...ackages/datastore/src/storage/adapter/indexeddb.ts	73.26% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 4 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 31a273e...4aa3aec. Read the comment docs.

[sammartinez]

LGTM, one callout that is NON BLOCKING so wanted to Approve

[sammartinez]

Future thinking, are we going to look to just have a ^ for newer versions? I understand the need for it now but was seeing what we are thinking on this?

[Amplifiyer]

yes, going forward we do want loose version numbers to avoid having duplicate package versions in client's app. but currently we can't risk it.

[sammartinez]

Agreed

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically locked since there hasn't been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

Looking for a help forum? We recommend joining the Amplify Community Discord server *-help channels or Discussions for those types of questions.