Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(route53): replace existing record sets #20416

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 16, 2022
Merged

Conversation

jogold
Copy link
Contributor

@jogold jogold commented May 19, 2022

Add a deleteExisting prop to RecordSet to delete an existing record
set before deploying the new one. This is useful if you want to minimize
downtime and avoid "manual" actions while deploying a stack with a
record set that already exists. This is typically the case for record
sets that are not already "owned" by CloudFormation or "owned" by
another stack or construct that is going to be deleted (migration).


All Submissions:

Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:

  • This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described here

New Features

  • Have you added the new feature to an integration test?
    • Did you use yarn integ to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. yarn integ without --dry-run)?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

Add a `deleteExisting` prop to `RecordSet` to delete an existing record
set before deploying the new one. This is useful if you want to minimize
downtime and avoid "manual" actions while deploying a stack with a
record set that already exists. This is typically the case for record
sets that are not already "owned" by CloudFormation or "owned" by
another stack or construct that is going to be deleted (migration).
@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented May 19, 2022

@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label May 19, 2022
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team May 19, 2022 15:46
new route53.ARecord(this, 'ARecord', {
zone: myZone,
target: route53.RecordTarget.fromIpAddresses('1.2.3.4', '5.6.7.8'),
deleteExisting: true,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the beginning I thought that upsert would have been a good name for this prop, but it's not a real UPSERT operation?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The existing name is definitely better.

@jogold jogold changed the base branch from v1-main to main June 2, 2022 07:15
Copy link
Contributor

@comcalvi comcalvi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR!

new route53.ARecord(this, 'ARecord', {
zone: myZone,
target: route53.RecordTarget.fromIpAddresses('1.2.3.4', '5.6.7.8'),
deleteExisting: true,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The existing name is definitely better.

Comment on lines -174 to +194
If you don't know the ID of the Hosted Zone to import, you can use the
If you don't know the ID of the Hosted Zone to import, you can use the
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch!

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 16, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: e41a997
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 2f92c35 into aws:main Jun 16, 2022
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 16, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@jogold jogold deleted the r53-existing-rs branch June 17, 2022 05:11
daschaa pushed a commit to daschaa/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2022
Add a `deleteExisting` prop to `RecordSet` to delete an existing record
set before deploying the new one. This is useful if you want to minimize
downtime and avoid "manual" actions while deploying a stack with a
record set that already exists. This is typically the case for record
sets that are not already "owned" by CloudFormation or "owned" by
another stack or construct that is going to be deleted (migration).


----

### All Submissions:

* [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)

### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:

* [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies)

### New Features

* [x] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)?
	* [x] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)?

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants