Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(s3-deployment): add CloudFront invalidation to deployments #3213

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Aug 5, 2019
Merged

feat(s3-deployment): add CloudFront invalidation to deployments #3213

merged 15 commits into from
Aug 5, 2019

Conversation

hoegertn
Copy link
Contributor

@hoegertn hoegertn commented Jul 5, 2019

see #3106

Please read the contribution guidelines and follow the pull-request checklist.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@hoegertn hoegertn requested a review from a team as a code owner July 5, 2019 11:52
@ghost ghost requested a review from eladb July 5, 2019 11:52
@hoegertn hoegertn requested a review from a team as a code owner July 12, 2019 10:55
source: s3deploy.Source.asset(path.join(__dirname, 'my-website.zip')),
destinationBucket: bucket,
distribution,
distributionPaths: ['/images/*']
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test what happens if "distribution" is provided but "distributionPaths" is omitted

handler.addToRolePolicy(new PolicyStatement({
effect: Effect.ALLOW,
actions: ['cloudfront:GetInvalidation', 'cloudfront:CreateInvalidation'],
resources: ['*'],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not restrict to this distribution ID?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will re-read the documentation but as I understand it there are no resource-level constraints for invalidations.

if (props.distributionPaths && !props.distribution) {
throw new Error("Distribution must be specified if distribution paths are specified");
}

const handler = new lambda.SingletonFunction(this, 'CustomResourceHandler', {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be nice to be able to validate that the cloudfront distribution has the bucket as a source origin.
Can you please raise an issue?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be tricky to find all possible and valid ways. You can add S3 in many different ways. What issue should be raised and where?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just raise an issue that describes the desire to be able to check that a web distribution has a specific bucket origin.

@NGL321 NGL321 self-assigned this Aug 1, 2019
@hoegertn
Copy link
Contributor Author

hoegertn commented Aug 2, 2019

@eladb Can we get this merged?

@eladb eladb merged commit e84bdd6 into aws:master Aug 5, 2019
eladb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2019
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2019
* chore: update package-lock.json

* feat(eks): define kubernetes resources

This change allows defining arbitrary Kubernetes resources within an EKS cluster.

* nice!

* update readme

* Update README.md

* feat(events): ability to add cross-account targets (#3323)

This adds the capability of adding a target to an event rule
that belongs to a different account than the rule itself.
Required for things like cross-account CodePipelines with source actions triggered by events.

* chore(ci): add mergify config file (#3502)

* chore: update jsii to 0.14.3 (#3513)

* fix(iam): correctly limit the default PolicyName to 128 characters (#3487)

Our logic for trimming the length of the default IAM policy name was not working,
as it wasn't updated when logicalId became a Token rather than a literate string,
and so it was never actually triggered
(it just checked that the display name of the Token was less than 128 characters,
which it always is).
The fix is to resolve the logical ID Token before applying the trimming logic.

Fixes #3402

* v1.3.0 (#3516)

See CHANGELOG

* fix: typo in restapi.ts (#3530)

* feat(ecs): container dependencies (#3032)

Add new addContainerDependencies method to allow for container dependencies
Fixes #2490

* feat(s3-deployment): CloudFront invalidation (#3213)

see #3106

* docs(core): findChild gets direct child only (#3512)

* doc(iam): update references to addManagedPolicy (#3511)

* fix(sqs): do not emit grants to the AWS-managed encryption key (#3169)

Grants on the `alias/aws/sqs` KMS key alias are not necessary since the
key will implicitly allow for it's intended usage to be fulfilled (as
opposed to how you have to manage grants yourself when using a
user-managed key instead).

This removes the statement that was generated using an invalid resource
entry.

Fixes #2794

* fix(lambda): allow ArnPrincipal in grantInvoke (#3501)

Fixes #3264 

I'm trying to allow a lambda function in another account to be able to invoke my CDK generated lambda function. This works through the CLI like so:

    aws lambda add-permission --function-name=myFunction --statement-id=ABoldStatement --action=lambda:InvokeFunction --principal=arn:aws:iam::{account_id}:role/a_lambda_execution_role

But CDK doesn't seem to allow me to add an ArnPrincipal doing something like this:

    myFunction.grantInvoke(new iam.ArnPrincipal(props.myARN))

With the error:

    Invalid principal type for Lambda permission statement: ArnPrincipal. Supported: AccountPrincipal, ServicePrincipal

This PR allows ArnPrincipal to be passed to lambda.grantInvoke.

There might be some additional validation required on the exact ARN as I believe only some ARNs are supported by lambda add-permission

* chore(contrib): remove API stabilization disclaimer

* fix(ssm): add GetParameters action to grantRead() (#3546)

* misc

* rename `KubernetesManifest` to `KubernetesResource` and `addResource`
* move AWS Auth APIs to `cluster.awsAuth` and expose `AwsAuth`
* remove the yaml library (we can just use a JSON stream)
* add support for adding accounts to aws-auth
* fix cluster deletion bug
* move kubctl app info to constants

* addManifest => addResource

* update test expectations

* add unit test for customresrouce.ref

* fix sample link
@hoegertn hoegertn deleted the cf-invalidate-s3 branch August 13, 2019 22:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants