fix(property-provider): do not make extra provider calls when concurrent

[AllanZhengYP]

Description

This change fix a regression introduced in #2680. It was caused by the code I removed without understanding the purpose: #2680 (comment). The bug will cause the provider being invoked multiple times before being cached.

With this change, I port back that feature that provider will only be executed once during concurrent calls. The unit test now has better description to prevent being removed.

Testing

Unit test, Manual test.

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@4f02b78). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2716   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   60.84%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      535           
  Lines           ?    27917           
  Branches        ?     6852           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    16987           
  Misses          ?    10930           
  Partials        ?        0           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4f02b78...45e94bb. Read the comment docs.

[github-actions]

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

[AllanZhengYP]

We notice some customers are getting intermittent failures while fetching credentials from STS. This issue became more prevalent in US-EAST-1 region using Amazon EKS managed AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) OpenID Connect (OIDC) external identity provider (IdP).

If you have the similar issue, please refer to the comment below for guidance of debugging:
#2680 (comment)