Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(clients): fix restXml protocol test for timestampFormat targets #4364

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2023

Conversation

srchase
Copy link
Contributor

@srchase srchase commented Jan 24, 2023

Issue

This PR updates serialization for restXml where a timestampFormat is on the target.

This clears the way to upgrade Smithy past 1.26.1, picking up the protocol tests for timestampFormat added in smithy-lang/smithy#1440.

Description

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Testing

Made change, ran yarn generate-clients. Successfully ran yarn test:protocols as well.

Additionally, the version of Smithy in codegen/gradle.properties and these changes were confirmed with the added protocol tests in smithy-lang/smithy#1440.

Additional context

A separate PR will be submitted after this is merged to update Smithy to the latest, 1.27.1, along with the updated protocol tests that will include.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@srchase srchase requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2023 22:34
@srchase srchase merged commit 4beb93b into aws:main Jan 24, 2023
@srchase srchase deleted the timestamp-on-target-ser branch January 24, 2023 23:05
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2023

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 8, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants