-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 670
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(feat) add distributed s3 write parquet #1526
(feat) add distributed s3 write parquet #1526
Conversation
9e1d161
to
ec0dfff
Compare
@@ -55,13 +55,14 @@ def _validate_args( | |||
description: Optional[str], | |||
parameters: Optional[Dict[str, str]], | |||
columns_comments: Optional[Dict[str, str]], | |||
distributed: Optional[bool] = False, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very minor nitpick, but I'm curious why you're passing this parameter rather than just using config.distributed
in the condition below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was causing a circular dependency. But I'll have a look for other ways to resolve it
5d87f6f
to
d5a5d67
Compare
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
da4a3df
to
a5d671a
Compare
* add type mappings to avoid inference * Refactoring - separate distributed write_parquet imlementation * Replace group iteration with apply() optimized for distributed scenario * Fix test regressions
a5d671a
to
91387d0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Love the refactoring overall, particularly splitting between the standard and distributed implementations, thanks. Left a few comments for clarification
Cleaned up older CodeBuild comments |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Relates
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.