Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: track existing node resources correctly in the event of unexpected DS pods #2322

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2022

Conversation

tzneal
Copy link
Contributor

@tzneal tzneal commented Aug 19, 2022

Description

If a DS pod schedules that we didn't expect due to the node looking
different upon creation (i.e. new dynamic labels or deprecated labels), we
would miscalculate the amount of ravailable node capacity.

Does this change impact docs?

  • Yes, PR includes docs updates
  • Yes, issue opened: #
  • No

Release Note


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

…ed DS pods

If a DS pod schedules that we didn't expect due to the node looking
different upon creation (i.e. new dynamic labels or deprecated labels), we
would miscalculate the amount of ravailable node capacity.
@tzneal tzneal requested a review from a team as a code owner August 19, 2022 16:52
@tzneal tzneal requested a review from dewjam August 19, 2022 16:52
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 19, 2022

Deploy Preview for karpenter-docs-prod canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 31048af
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/karpenter-docs-prod/deploys/62ffbfd4f3f2200009223dad

Copy link
Contributor

@bwagner5 bwagner5 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@tzneal tzneal merged commit 0f230ef into aws:main Aug 19, 2022
@tzneal tzneal deleted the handle-unexpected-ds-pods-scheduling branch August 19, 2022 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants