Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support kubelet graceful shutdown for Bottlerocket #4571

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2023

Conversation

bwagner5
Copy link
Contributor

@bwagner5 bwagner5 commented Sep 6, 2023

Fixes #N/A
#4536
bottlerocket-os/bottlerocket#2930

Description

  • Support Kubelet graceful shutdown for Bottelrocket in BRs kubernetes configuration block.

How was this change tested?

  • Manually on EKS cluster.

Does this change impact docs?

  • Yes, PR includes docs updates
  • Yes, issue opened: #
  • No

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@bwagner5 bwagner5 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 6, 2023 16:28
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 6, 2023

Deploy Preview for karpenter-docs-prod ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c92aeaf
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/karpenter-docs-prod/deploys/64f8a89134dceb000857dab9
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4571--karpenter-docs-prod.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@jonathan-innis jonathan-innis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make an update to the E2E test? Or do we already validate that passing these settings through succeeds on BR?

@bwagner5
Copy link
Contributor Author

bwagner5 commented Sep 6, 2023

Can we make an update to the E2E test? Or do we already validate that passing these settings through succeeds on BR?

Today we just validate that some params pass thru and test the merge logic. If we wanted to actually test, we'd need to add all BR params to the suite-test. Not sure if it makes sense to test each param like that though. We don't test the other pass thru params (outside of the kubernetes block)

Copy link
Contributor

@jonathan-innis jonathan-innis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah got it. This isn't being added to our Provisioner, this is just adding support for the user to be able to specify it in the AWSNodeTemplate merge logic

@bwagner5 bwagner5 merged commit 4da3fef into aws:main Sep 6, 2023
14 checks passed
@bwagner5 bwagner5 deleted the br-graceful branch September 6, 2023 19:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants