You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I saw the task2vec complexity using l1. But the l1 complexities might not be comparable across data sets. How would you suggest to adjust this metric s.t. its directly comparable accross data sets?
My suggestion is to divide perhaps by the std l1 complexity for that data set e.g.:
I saw the task2vec complexity using l1. But the l1 complexities might not be comparable across data sets. How would you suggest to adjust this metric s.t. its directly comparable accross data sets?
My suggestion is to divide perhaps by the std l1 complexity for that data set e.g.:
thoughts? This does assume normality and n>=30. Histograms showing normality might be useful.
related: https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/604296/how-does-one-create-comparable-metrics-when-the-original-metrics-are-not-compara
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: