Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

S3: SSECustomerKey and CopySourceSSECustomerKey should be blob shapes #248

Closed
kggilmer opened this issue Mar 4, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

S3: SSECustomerKey and CopySourceSSECustomerKey should be blob shapes #248

kggilmer opened this issue Mar 4, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
customization Service Customization no-auto-closure We do not want this issue to be automatically closed. post-dp Not likely in scope until after Dev Preview

Comments

@kggilmer
Copy link
Contributor

kggilmer commented Mar 4, 2021

internal id: 176559035
@kggilmer kggilmer changed the title SSECustomerKey and CopySourceSSECustomerKey should be blob shapes S3: SSECustomerKey and CopySourceSSECustomerKey should be blob shapes May 12, 2021
@aajtodd aajtodd transferred this issue from smithy-lang/smithy-kotlin Jul 8, 2021
@aajtodd aajtodd added customization Service Customization post-dp Not likely in scope until after Dev Preview labels Jul 8, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2022

This is a very old issue that is probably not getting as much attention as it deserves. We encourage you to check if this is still an issue in the latest release and if you find that this is still a problem, please feel free to provide a comment or open a new issue.

@github-actions github-actions bot added closing-soon This issue will automatically close in 2 days unless further comments are made. closed-for-staleness and removed closing-soon This issue will automatically close in 2 days unless further comments are made. labels Jul 8, 2022
@ianbotsf ianbotsf added no-auto-closure We do not want this issue to be automatically closed. and removed closed-for-staleness labels Jul 11, 2022
@ianbotsf ianbotsf reopened this Jul 11, 2022
@ianbotsf
Copy link
Contributor

ianbotsf commented Jun 7, 2023

I question whether this is necessary after all. It appears that Java, Python, JavaScript, and .NET all treat this as a string, not a blob.

@ianbotsf
Copy link
Contributor

We've decided not to do this.

@github-actions
Copy link

⚠️COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING⚠️

Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.
If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
customization Service Customization no-auto-closure We do not want this issue to be automatically closed. post-dp Not likely in scope until after Dev Preview
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@aajtodd @kggilmer @ianbotsf