Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better support for SoftRF / Transmitting Flarm #21

Closed
b3nn0 opened this issue Jul 26, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Better support for SoftRF / Transmitting Flarm #21

b3nn0 opened this issue Jul 26, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@b3nn0
Copy link
Owner

b3nn0 commented Jul 26, 2019

Hi,
Stratux has rudimentary support for SoftRF. This is implemented by

  • starting a dump1090 process with --net-only
  • reading SoftrRF dump1090 output via Serial, forwarding it to dump19090
  • reading traffic from dump1090

This has a couple of drawbacks:

  • it interferes with the dump1090 process for the SDRs, so you can only have EITHER a SoftRF connection OR a 1090ES SDR enabled
  • We have two GPS in the device, the SoftRF one is ignored for Stratux

Is it worth implementing better Support for SoftRF (especially the T-Beam)?

Benefit:

  • We can easily transmit Flarm
  • We can also receive OGNTP and PilotAware if desired
  • We could use the SoftRF builtin GPS for Stratux
  • The second SDR would be free for UAT reception

Drawbacks:

  • SoftRFs Flarm reception range seems to be quite a bit worse than the OGN stack with an SDR
  • Another PCB - different case is needed (could provide a 3D printable model that fits a Stratux+SoftRF build)

Implementation:
I think it would make most sense to parse the SoftRF NMEA stream instead of the dump1090 stream, as it provides more information.

Another possibility would be to just slightly improve the current support to not start its own dump1090 if we already have 1090ES enabled - so that both work in parallel.

@b3nn0
Copy link
Owner Author

b3nn0 commented Aug 21, 2019

Closed due to lack of interest.

@b3nn0 b3nn0 closed this as completed Aug 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant