Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix loader-utils vulnerability #979

Merged

Conversation

LuckyLuky
Copy link

Please Read the CONTRIBUTING Guidelines
In particular the portion on Commit Message Formatting

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Other: Vulnerability fix

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

Dependency on loader-utils version with severe vulnerabilities.

What is the new behavior?

Dependency on loader-utils version with no known vulnerabilities.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information:

Vulnerability description: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37601
Lower versions than 2.0.4 had another vulnerabilities, that's the reason why I've used this particular version.

This PR is intended to be tagged as 8.3.1.

Copy link
Contributor

@JLHwung JLHwung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@JLHwung JLHwung merged commit 55eb044 into babel:8.x Jan 2, 2023
@LuckyLuky LuckyLuky deleted the security-vulnerability-loader-utils-fix branch January 9, 2023 09:07
@zacharyfmarion
Copy link

@JLHwung has this fix gone out in an 8.x release?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants