New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mark ThisExpression
and Super
as Purish
#12251
Conversation
The other purish types are functions and literals, so I guess it means "it doesn't have side effects"
Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/31175/ |
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit f962a32:
|
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ defineType("SwitchStatement", { | |||
}); | |||
|
|||
defineType("ThisExpression", { | |||
aliases: ["Expression"], | |||
aliases: ["Expression", "Pureish"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a test in packages/babel-traverse/test/scope.js
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we also mark Super
as Pureish
?
defineType("Super", { |
ThisExpression
as Purish
ThisExpression
and Super
as Purish
I noticed that
Pureish
was used for literals and for functions, so it means "something that doesn't have side-effects when evaluated".This has the effect of returning
true
frompath.isPure()
for this, potentially removingthis
when it's not used in some transforms.Extracted from #12250.