Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Properly resolve scope from switch statement - fixes T6761 #3133

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 4, 2015
Merged

Properly resolve scope from switch statement - fixes T6761 #3133

merged 1 commit into from Dec 4, 2015

Conversation

loganfsmyth
Copy link
Member

I moved this line in #3127 but I didn't move it up far enough!

@loganfsmyth loganfsmyth changed the title Properly resolve scope from switch statement - fixes T6762 Properly resolve scope from switch statement - fixes T6761 Dec 4, 2015
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 84.63%

Merging #3133 into master will decrease coverage by -0.09% as of 747b649

@@            master   #3133   diff @@
======================================
  Files          214     214       
  Stmts        15571   15571       
  Branches      3320    3320       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
- Hit          13192   13179    -13
- Partial        702     717    +15
+ Missed        1677    1675     -2

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 747b649

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@hzoo
Copy link
Member

hzoo commented Dec 4, 2015

Lol can't move it up any further at least

loganfsmyth added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2015
@loganfsmyth
Merge pull request #3133 from loganfsmyth/switch-scope-6761
164bc1a 
Properly resolve scope from switch statement - fixes T6761
@loganfsmyth loganfsmyth merged commit 164bc1a into babel:master Dec 4, 2015
@loganfsmyth loganfsmyth deleted the switch-scope-6761 branch December 4, 2015 17:32
@babel-bot babel-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2016
Closed
@lock lock bot added the outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue label Oct 8, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 8, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
outdated A closed issue/PR that is archived due to age. Recommended to make a new issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@loganfsmyth @codecov-io @hzoo