New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement code changes as suggested by analysis tools #10287
Conversation
Signed-off-by: AaronvDiepen <aaronvdiepen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: AaronvDiepen <aaronvdiepen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: AaronvDiepen <aaronvdiepen@gmail.com>
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 4521e67 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 53 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Some jobs seem to have failed due to server connection errors, is this due to my code changes or was the github <-> server connection failing? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense :)
Hey @AaronvDiepen, congrats on your first merged PR 🎉 Nice work 👍 Please let me know if we can be helpful in any way. |
Hey, I just made a Pull Request!
For our university course Software Architecture we are analysing various open source systems and after running various code analysis tools on the Backstage project we have detected a few minor mistakes that might give unexpected results.
The changes (and their explanations) are:
a non-null variable can not suddenly turn into null, most likely the writer thought he was doing boolean conversion
might give the illusion that a function returns a promise while it does not
The tool used to find these changes was deepsource.io.
✔️ Checklist
Signed-off-by
line in the message. (more info)