Replies: 2 comments
-
Hi Daniel,
Yes, a lot of EXSLT covers stuff that was missing from XSLT v1 but has subsequently been incorporated into later versions. So supporting it is a low priority.
However, Xrust separates the semantics from the syntax, so EXSLT is simply a different syntax. Therefore it will be very low cost to add support once the underlying functionality has been implemented.
Cheers,
Steve
… On 10 Dec 2023, at 12:33 pm, Daniel Murphy ***@***.***> wrote:
I know that pretty much everything in it is covered by newer XSLT versions but might be worth implementing anyway?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#68>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUCP5QKOHYRZ6PPJVAX7BKDYIUGO5AVCNFSM6AAAAABAOF7OS2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ERDJONRXK43TNFXW4OZVHE2DENJUG4>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Sounds good. I'll leave it be for the moment. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I know that pretty much everything in it is covered by newer XSLT versions but might be worth implementing anyway?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions