Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The operator calls can't boil down to regular Call #5

Closed
bananu7 opened this issue Mar 19, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

The operator calls can't boil down to regular Call #5

bananu7 opened this issue Mar 19, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels
bug

Comments

@bananu7
Copy link
Owner

bananu7 commented Mar 19, 2017

Because of

_G["+"](x,y)

Being fundamentally different from

x + y
@bananu7 bananu7 added the bug label Mar 19, 2017
@bananu7
Copy link
Owner Author

bananu7 commented Feb 23, 2018

I think that given existing op implementations, doing that is gonna be really easy. One potential issue is that op names are strings and not enums, which could potentially make Eval nontotal. If possible, enums should be introduced.

@bananu7
Copy link
Owner Author

bananu7 commented Feb 23, 2018

Related, and possibly fixed by #28.

@bananu7 bananu7 mentioned this issue Jul 26, 2018
Closed
@bananu7
Copy link
Owner Author

bananu7 commented Jul 26, 2018

I'm pretty sure this depends on #40.

@bananu7 bananu7 mentioned this issue Sep 23, 2018
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@bananu7