New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: improve anotation message #97
feat: improve anotation message #97
Conversation
dist/index.js
Outdated
@@ -10536,7 +10534,7 @@ const createGithubAccessToken = async (githubAppToken) => { | |||
|
|||
const response = await makeRequest(query, variables); | |||
|
|||
if (!response.data && !response.data.createGithubAccessToken.success) { | |||
if (!response.data || !response.data.createGithubAccessToken.success) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When I execute yarn build
, it will contain things that are not my changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let me try to rebuild the master, maybe it was built not with newest version
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
everything should be fine now, you should merge with newest master
|
||
const message = `file=${file}::${formattedLines} ${linesWord} not covered with tests`; | ||
|
||
// NOTE: consider an option to show lines directly by attaching 'line' param |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand the case of this comment. Under what conditions does it occur?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is more an issue for Node.js applications coverage reports, mentioned here #40
I think it's great to remove this comment, I will check one more if we can get it fixed before running this action.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK. I'll revert back to comment.
Looks good, thanks for your contribution! |
recreate #96. I couldn't reopen it because I rebased it.
annotation example
I need help with the two comment places.