We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As I was reviewing the parsing code, I noticed that the usages of void is redundant, the *> operators already drops the left functors argument.
*>
So you don't really need void in protoString and sep.
void
protoString
sep
When you do need void it's possible to apply it on the outside during composition. I can submit a PR if you like?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
As I was reviewing the parsing code, I noticed that the usages of void is redundant, the
*>
operators already drops the left functors argument.So you don't really need
void
inprotoString
andsep
.When you do need
void
it's possible to apply it on the outside during composition. I can submit a PR if you like?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: