Add troubleshooting steps for lights #427
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you so much, this is awesome! |
basnijholt
reviewed
Feb 10, 2023
Co-authored-by: Andrew Berry <andrew@furrypaws.ca>
|
@all-contributors please add @deviantintegral for docs |
|
I've put up a pull request to add @deviantintegral! 🎉 |
|
Thank you so much! |
That would be really great! Also add it to pre-commit such that we won't forget to update it :) |
|
@deviantintegral thank you so much for writing this! You saved me countless hours, I still reference those sections after the fact! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I previously tried out Adaptive Lighting over a year ago, and walked back because I had issues with lights not responding or turning themselves on. Since then, I've figured out the underlying causes, and have been happily using Adaptive Lights for the past month.
My hope is this will help reduce support requests for things the integration can't fix. These could potentially be referenced in an issue template as well.
Unrelated, but I think the README could benefit from a table of contents. I usually use https://github.com/thlorenz/doctoc. If there's interest, I'm glad to do that in this PR or in a new one.