Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More slides splits and image overlays #24

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2016
Merged

More slides splits and image overlays #24

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2016

Conversation

robertodr
Copy link
Contributor

This adds some more slide splits with different percentage of space per column.
The following creates a 50-50 split of the slides with two columns:


---
layout: false
class: split-50
## The Problem of Solvation

.column[
Something
]
.column[
Something else
]

Available splits are: 30-70, 40-60, 50-50, 60-40 and 70-30

Moreover, image overlays are also possible, albeit with explicit HTML syntax:

<div class="imageWrapper">
  <img class="overlayImage" src="images/spherical_diffuse.jpg" style="width: 80%" align="middle">
--
  <img class="overlayImage" src="images/paper.png" style="width: 110%" align="middle">
</div>
<p style="clear: both;">

@bast
Copy link
Owner

bast commented Oct 8, 2016

Thanks! I will test this very soon on my side and then integrate.

@bast
Copy link
Owner

bast commented Oct 8, 2016

No time to test now but I trust you with this :-)

@bast bast merged commit aae7704 into bast:master Oct 8, 2016
@robertodr
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've used them both on a couple of slide decks this for example

@robertodr robertodr deleted the feature_splits branch October 9, 2016 00:28
@bast
Copy link
Owner

bast commented Oct 9, 2016

Looks good :-)

@bast
Copy link
Owner

bast commented Oct 9, 2016

I wonder whether it would be more intuitive to call them e.g. split-70-30 - or does it look redundant? I am worried here about backwards compatibility of the naming. The functionality is great.

@robertodr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, of course! Rename as you see fit. I agree that the names are not immediate.

@bast
Copy link
Owner

bast commented Oct 9, 2016

Renamed in ec56766.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants