-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename testPolicies to testRoutePolicies #3448
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3448 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 73.11% 73.11%
Complexity 23778 23778
=========================================
Files 2062 2062
Lines 99547 99547
Branches 11935 11935
=========================================
Hits 72784 72784
Misses 21428 21428
Partials 5335 5335
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I may have misled you -- it seems that we are using RoutingPolicy everywhere (e.g., in variable type and in internal classes) and not RoutePolicy. Worth it to make it consistent? Up to you.
Reviewed 9 of 13 files at r1, 3 of 3 files at r2.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved
No description provided.