Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename testPolicies to testRoutePolicies #3448

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 22, 2019

Conversation

anothermattbrown
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@batfish-bot
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 22, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #3448 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 80%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #3448   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     73.11%   73.11%           
  Complexity    23778    23778           
=========================================
  Files          2062     2062           
  Lines         99547    99547           
  Branches      11935    11935           
=========================================
  Hits          72784    72784           
  Misses        21428    21428           
  Partials       5335     5335
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...n/testroutepolicies/TestRoutePoliciesAnswerer.java 100% <ø> (ø) 8 <0> (?)
...tfish/question/testroutepolicies/BgpRouteDiff.java 84.9% <ø> (ø) 15 <0> (?)
...n/testroutepolicies/TestRoutePoliciesQuestion.java 96.29% <100%> (ø) 9 <1> (?)
...routepolicies/TestRoutePoliciesQuestionPlugin.java 66.66% <66.66%> (ø) 2 <2> (?)
...g/batfish/datamodel/acl/IpAccessListLineIndex.java 33.33% <0%> (-5.56%) 4% <0%> (-1%)
...src/main/java/org/batfish/coordinator/PoolMgr.java 65.16% <0%> (+1.12%) 16% <0%> (+1%) ⬆️

Copy link
Member

@ratulm ratulm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I may have misled you -- it seems that we are using RoutingPolicy everywhere (e.g., in variable type and in internal classes) and not RoutePolicy. Worth it to make it consistent? Up to you.

Reviewed 9 of 13 files at r1, 3 of 3 files at r2.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved

Copy link
Member

@ratulm ratulm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved

@anothermattbrown anothermattbrown merged commit 1bfa4cc into master Mar 22, 2019
@anothermattbrown anothermattbrown deleted the matt-rename-testPolicies branch March 22, 2019 16:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants