-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FRR: Guard against BGP interface neighbor on an undefined interface #6588
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6588 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 73.38% 73.38% -0.01%
+ Complexity 35769 35766 -3
============================================
Files 2839 2839
Lines 144403 144408 +5
Branches 17476 17477 +1
============================================
- Hits 105977 105976 -1
- Misses 30016 30019 +3
- Partials 8410 8413 +3
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 2 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @arifogel and @ratulm)
projects/batfish/src/test/java/org/batfish/representation/cumulus/CumulusConversionsTest.java, line 1894 at r2 (raw file):
@Test public void testAddBgpNeighbor_undefinedInterface() { // set up the VI bgp process
this is a tossup comment.
Even though it's a "worse" test, I'd prefer a test that started from config snippets. Even though it's more e2e-y, that's more robust to changing VS model - we've seen recently that these get hard to maintain e.g., if we refactor some of the VS or conversion code slightly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 2 of 3 files at r3.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved
No description provided.