Update Error Prone version to 2.20.0

[cushon]

#19054

[Wyverald]

Just so that I understand, will we need a new java_tools release after this? Or is it enough to cherry-pick this alone to 6.3.1?

[Wyverald]

I resolved the merge conflict, but we'll still need to repin the Maven stuff.

[meteorcloudy]

Just so that I understand, will we need a new java_tools release after this?

I believe we'll need a new java_tools release. /cc @keertk

For Bazel@6.3.1, just update the java_tools version following the old process.
For Bazel@HEAD, we'll also need a new rules_java release, then update the rules_java version in Bazel.

[keertk]

@cushon Can you submit a PR to cherry-pick these particular changes into release-6.3.1? The WORKSPACE file is quite different and maven_install.json doesn't exist in the release branch.

And side note, the java_tools and rules_java releases are complete. In the process of being merged to master and cherry-picked into 6.3.1.

[cushon]

And side note, the java_tools and rules_java releases are complete. In the process of being merged to master and cherry-picked into 6.3.1.

To double-check: were those releases done off the main branch, and are being cherry-picked into 6.3.1? I thought the only use of these jars was to bundle them into a java_tools release, so we'd only need to update them on 6.3.1 if java_tools are being build on 6.3.1. Is that the case?

[cushon]

Either way, 6.3.1 has already been updated to use Error Prone 2.20.0 (it was out of sync with the main branch): e0c2080. So I don't think anything else is needed there.

[keertk]

So to clarify, cherry-picking the new java_tools release (#19091) as per #19066 (comment) is sufficient to fix the issue reported in #19054, correct?

[cushon]

Yes, I double-checked that the java_tools release in #19091 contains the fix for google/error-prone#3931