Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the unsafe_shared_cache option #834

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 18, 2023

Conversation

shs96c
Copy link
Collaborator

@shs96c shs96c commented Jan 17, 2023

This feature wasn't being tested properly, so we had no way of determining whether it would work. For the case of pinning artifacts (which is the recommended approach) it's possible to use the COURSIER_CACHE env var to still use the shared cache.

@shs96c shs96c requested a review from cheister as a code owner January 17, 2023 14:08
@shs96c shs96c requested a review from jin January 17, 2023 14:09
@cheister
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like the tests still reference duplicate_artifacts_test somewhere though

This feature wasn't being tested properly, so we had no
way of determining whether it would work. For the case
of pinning artifacts (which is the recommended approach)
it's possible to use the `COURSIER_CACHE` env var to
still use the shared cache.
@shs96c shs96c merged commit 0b272fd into bazelbuild:master Jan 18, 2023
@shs96c shs96c deleted the remove-shared-cache branch January 18, 2023 11:55
lukaciko added a commit to lukaciko/rules_jvm_external that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2023
The test using the file was removed in bazelbuild#834.
shs96c pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2023
The test using the file was removed in #834.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants