test: use a custom rule instead of native.filegroup for testing that PyInfo is a required provider. #1479
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…PyInfo is a required provider. Within Google, for historical reasons, the filegroup rule type is allowed in deps, which means `test_requires_pyinfo` test fails. This can be easily worked around by using a custom rule that doesn't have the same name.
rickeylev
force-pushed
the
stricter-pyinfo-requires-test
branch
from
43468ed
to
317e08b
Compare
Solumin
approved these changes
Oct 9, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Within Google, for historical reasons, the filegroup rule type is allowed in deps, which means
test_requires_pyinfotest fails. This can be easily worked around by using a custom rule that doesn't have the same name.