Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix rust_doc_test using execpath paths instead of rootpath #1129

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2022

Conversation

UebelAndre
Copy link
Collaborator

This change was split from #1119 (comment)

Copy link
Collaborator

@krasimirgg krasimirgg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

Just to clarify, does this need to be submitted after #1119?

Copy link
Collaborator

@illicitonion illicitonion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess #1119 will act as a test for this?

@UebelAndre
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Just to clarify, does this need to be submitted after #1119?

No, these changes are effectively a no-op since the execpath and rootpath of rustdoc is the same today. My thought in opening this was to reduce the size of that PR.

@UebelAndre
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I guess #1119 will act as a test for this?

That's where these changes would begin to take effect. Technically there's already coverage since there's already tests for rust_doc_test. I don't think additional testing is needed in this change.

@UebelAndre UebelAndre merged commit f569827 into bazelbuild:main Feb 8, 2022
cfredric pushed a commit to cfredric/rules_rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants