New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support windows #178
Comments
Native Windows support is currently scheduled for Q4, but we have a Windows machine on which to perform the work, and there are no blockers. Is resolution in October sufficient, or do you need something this month? |
That's fine, I don't support Windows with the typescript rules yet either.
…On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:11 PM Joshua Bruning ***@***.***> wrote:
Native Windows support is currently scheduled for Q4, but we have a
Windows machine on which to perform the work, and there are no blockers. Is
resolution in October sufficient, or do you need something this month?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#178 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC5Iys_qV1hBl1kSxnjkf-7snDfzF3iks5sgdfLgaJpZM4PRznw>
.
|
Define native Chrome/Windows. See #178. This is the initial definition of a native Chrome/Windows configuration. Note that this does not yet work due to the @io_bazel_rules_go_toolchain// release not yet supporting Windows 10 (and potentially other yet-to-be- discovered issues).
My PR will resolve many of the issues; a fix to bazelbuild/rules_go#736 should resolve remaining known issues. (Then the ball will be back in our court.) |
Define native Chrome/Windows. See #178. This is the initial definition of a native Chrome/Windows configuration. Note that this does not yet work due to the @io_bazel_rules_go_toolchain// release not yet supporting Windows 10 (and potentially other yet-to-be- discovered issues).
Even if users are required to define their own browser configurations, it still seems there is no such configuration that works with these rules on Windows. |
A fix for bazelbuild/rules_go#1619 was made about a month ago. We can try to update our version of rules_go and see what the next blocker is; Marc had only removed Windows configurations as they weren't working anyway. |
After the most recent rules_go update, core Go components seem to build fine (!), but the browser configurations are getting stuck on web/internal/extract.sh - need to make this Windows compatible, I think (so long as I'm reading the errors correctly). |
@joshbruning I think I saw that error in #284 (comment) when I was trying to define my own browsers, as well as use the provided ones. |
Heya just wanted to mention I tried the latest master and Chrome does run on Windows. Cheers! |
There seems to be some issue with Chrome 88+ on Windows Server:
In our case the tests pass locally but not on our Windows CI: https://source.cloud.google.com/results/invocations/17e1620a-df58-430b-bbad-49dfbef6332e/targets/%2F%2Fexamples%2Ftesting:testing_chromium-local/log |
(Chrome 88+ -> Chrome 68+) We validated on "Windows Server 2016 Datacenter". 66.0.3359.181 has branch base position: 540276. 540270 is the closest I see in chromium-browser-snapshots. In web/repositories.bzl, you can put Chromium/Windows back on 540270 (and update sha). You'll also probably want to put chromedriver/Windows back on 2.38: If you send me a pull request, I'll merge it; otherwise, let me know if you just want me to do it when I have a spare cycle. |
Chrome 68+ is broken on Windows Server: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=873097 Fix bazelbuild#178 (comment)
Chrome 68+ is broken on Windows Server: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=873097 Fix bazelbuild#178 (comment)
@joshbruning thanks for the guidance, I put a PR up at #303 |
Chrome 68+ is broken on Windows Server: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=873097 Fix #178 (comment)
At least half the Angular ecosystem runs on Windows machines.
currently trying the simple python example from the README I get
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: