Shorten workflow filenames #39
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
EliahKagan
force-pushed
the
workflow-filenames
branch
from
5cb8c7c
to
49487fe
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
test-package.ymlandpublish-package.ymlfiles were introduced in #30, together with reorganization and packaging, which their names reflect. However, I don't think the-packagepart of the filenames is very important. The shorter names are also easier to distinguish, since they have less in common, so if a PR ever proposes a change to one that should be made to the other instead, it may be easier to notice this during review even amongst other noise.