Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow for configuration of intro message #13

Open
MineRobber9000 opened this issue Nov 2, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Allow for configuration of intro message #13

MineRobber9000 opened this issue Nov 2, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement server relates to the server urwid Relates to the urwid client
Projects
bbj roadmap

Comments

@MineRobber9000
Copy link
Contributor

For example, configuring the intro a discussion board for tilde.town to a discussion board for {yourserver.com}.

This would obsolete the tilde.team fork of BBJ (as it could just be configured to say tilde.team and not tilde.town.
@MineRobber9000 MineRobber9000 added enhancement urwid Relates to the urwid client labels Nov 2, 2018
@MineRobber9000 MineRobber9000 added this to To Do in bbj roadmap via automation Nov 2, 2018
@desvox desvox added the server relates to the server label Nov 4, 2018
@benharri
Copy link
Member

benharri commented Feb 26, 2019 •
edited

mostly handled by 5c708b4

feel free to reopen if we need further configuration for this.

bbj roadmap automation moved this from To Do to Done Feb 26, 2019
@MineRobber9000
Copy link
Contributor Author

no, the idea is that the server should be able to control what the intro message says for "BBJ is a discussion board for {whatever}".

@MineRobber9000 MineRobber9000 reopened this Mar 1, 2019
bbj roadmap automation moved this from Done to To Do Mar 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement server relates to the server urwid Relates to the urwid client
Projects
bbj roadmap
  
To Do
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@benharri @desvox @MineRobber9000