Skip to content

bckim92/colloquial-claims

main
Switch branches/tags

Name already in use

A tag already exists with the provided branch name. Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. Are you sure you want to create this branch?
Code

Latest commit

 

Git stats

Files

Permalink
Failed to load latest commit information.
Type
Name
Latest commit message
Commit time
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

How Robust are Fact Checking Systems
on Colloquial Claims?

figure

Official PyTorch implementation of our NAACL paper:
Byeongchang Kim*, Hyunwoo Kim*, Seokhee Hong, and Gunhee Kim. How Robust are Fact Checking Systems on Colloquial Claims? NAACL-HLT, 2021 [Paper] (* equal contribution)

If you use the materials in this repository as part of any published research, we ask you to cite the following paper:

@inproceedings{Kim:2021:colloquial,
  title={How Robust are Fact Checking Systems on Colloquial Claims?},
  author={Kim, Byeongchang and Kim, Hyunwoo and Hong, Seokhee and Kim, Gunhee},
  booktitle={NAACL-HLT},
  year={2021}
}

Colloquial Claims dataset

You can download the paper version of our Colloquial Claims dataset via following urls:
[train] [valid] [test]

You can read and explore the dataset as follows:

import json

turns = []
with open('colloquial_claims_train.jsonl', 'r') as fp:
    for line in fp:
        turns.append(json.loads(line))

print(turns[0].keys())
# dict_keys(['colloquial_claims', 'fever_claim', 'fever_label', 'evidences', 'gold_evidence_set', 'fever_id'])

Running style transfer pipeline

In progress

About

✅ How Robust are Fact Checking Systems on Colloquial Claims?. In NAACL-HLT, 2021.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published