Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix UnitQuaternion constructor with v keyword. #118

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

myeatman-bdai
Copy link
Collaborator

Add code+test to make sure using 4x1 vector with v keyword argument in UnitQuaternion works.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jcao-bdai jcao-bdai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (ad98b0e) 77.76% compared to head (11564a9) 77.78%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #118      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.76%   77.78%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        5137     5141       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         3995     3999       +4     
  Misses       1142     1142              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@kaiyu-zheng kaiyu-zheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@myeatman-bdai myeatman-bdai merged commit 470962c into master Feb 23, 2024
19 checks passed
@myeatman-bdai myeatman-bdai deleted the UnitQuaternion-Constructor-with-v branch February 23, 2024 20:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants