Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix License Tool for 64bit archs #37

Open
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

sononum
Copy link

@sononum sononum commented Jun 23, 2014

fixes endless loop in the table view and fixes drop operation for license info window.

Built and tested on OS X 10.9

Mathew Waters and others added 20 commits September 6, 2012 17:08
…cated openssl functions

A complete re-write using the new Apple APIs
Note we still can't produce a PEM encoded private key from the raw
data, so for legacy key support we should still use the old version of
the developer tool.

This tool now saves public and private keys in PEM format
SecItemImport is able to check the input type, but we might as well set
it properly
…ject on 10.8 when the 10.9 SDK is installed).
…7. Replacing this with a simple CFReadStream loop.
Updates the CoreFoundation AquaticPrime implementation to use Security framework rather than deprecated OpenSSL.
Conflicts:
	.gitignore
	License Utility/Classes/AQAppKit/OAGradientTableView.m
	License Utility/Classes/InfoController.m
	Source/CoreFoundation/APCoreFoundationTester.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj
	Source/CoreFoundation/AquaticPrime.c
	Source/CoreFoundation/AquaticPrime.h
@bdrister
Copy link
Owner

I'm terribly sorry that I haven't responded to this for so long. Somehow checking the address on this account slipped through the cracks for a long time so I never received the notification.

Given that this pull request is somewhat stale at this point, are there any other updates that need to be made to bring this up-to-date? Perhaps it would make sense to work with the other devs with outstanding pull requests to ensure they all work together and can be merged in all at once. I've made the same suggestion on the other requests, so they should be expecting some contact.

Again, sorry about the unresponsiveness.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants